Paul Masson And The Case of Wine
Myself and SB lived together in the Pikey stronghold of Clifton once. We were surrounded by people stealing cars, fathering (or mothering) illegitimate children in Co-op car park, and drinking White Lightning on street corners. One day a perfect opportunity came to us to right at least one wrong. An opportunity so tempting that we were reduced to spectators on the ensuing events.
It was a quiet Saturday evening and myself and SB were recovering from the previous nights adventures with a few refreshing bottles of wine (SB) and some Vodka Red Bull (myself). By around 9pm it was quite dark, we were fairly drunk and there was, as always on a Saturday night, little entertainment on the televisual horizon. We put on a video. I vaguely remember watching Predator in that flat, so let's assume that this is what we watched.
Part way through the video, SB needed a piss. Not wanting to miss any part of a film he had doubtless seen many times before, he decided on an unusual solution. Instead of pausing the video, he decided that the empty bottle of Paul Masson wine sitting in front of him would be a perfect piss-catcher. Some discussion ensued as to whether this was a good idea. My side of the argument lost, however I did get him to concede that he would piss behind a sofa instead of in plain sight.
The image of SB's grimacing head, coupled to the sounds of piss flowing into a rapidly filling wine bottle were too hilarious to describe, so I won't attempt it. Suffice to say I missed a substantial part of the film laughing at SB's antics.
For those who don't know, a Paul Masson bottle has a screw / clip-on lid as well as tapering sides which allow easy access for piss as well as convenient replacement of the cap for those stupid enough to drink wine by the glass rather than the bottle. See here. The bottle sat on the table, fermenting both chemically and in a more abstract way - bubbling up ideas in my fertile mind.
The bottle, filled as it was with urine, looked exactly the same as when it was first purchased. Myself and SB settled on a plan. There was a bus stop 10 metres from our flat which was often populated by Pikeys. A full bottle of a "classy" wine like Paul Masson would be a supreme treat for them. We put the full bottle on the wall next to the bus stop and retired to the flat to drink further and wait for our trap to be sprung.
The next day we left the flat for supplies and walked past the bottle we had managed to forget about in fits of laughter. It was still proudly displayed on the wall, something that amazed us both. A brief (2 hour) stint at the pub later we returned with snacks and drinks ready to settle in. The bottle was gone.
It had not travelled far and was located upside down, empty, in the bin next to the bus stop. Using the empirical evidence at our disposal, we formed the following conclusions:
> At least one person had touched a bottle full of SB's piss.
> At least one person had opened this bottle
We also made the following, fairly sound assumptions:
> At least one person thought that the contents were a gift of wine.
> At least one person smelled the contents of this bottle, or otherwise discovered its contents.
> This person was most likely a Pikey, or Pikette.
Obvious, unsubstantiated conclusions could also be drawn, such as some Pikey having a drink of this "wine". This would certainly not be outside the realms of possibility - an average Pikey would share intelligence levels with an amoeba and therefore drink down the gift with little thought for consequence. However, myself and SB were more than happy with the sound assertions we could make and no further conjecture was required to leave us crying happy tears of justice at the suffering of at least one Pikey.
It was a quiet Saturday evening and myself and SB were recovering from the previous nights adventures with a few refreshing bottles of wine (SB) and some Vodka Red Bull (myself). By around 9pm it was quite dark, we were fairly drunk and there was, as always on a Saturday night, little entertainment on the televisual horizon. We put on a video. I vaguely remember watching Predator in that flat, so let's assume that this is what we watched.
Part way through the video, SB needed a piss. Not wanting to miss any part of a film he had doubtless seen many times before, he decided on an unusual solution. Instead of pausing the video, he decided that the empty bottle of Paul Masson wine sitting in front of him would be a perfect piss-catcher. Some discussion ensued as to whether this was a good idea. My side of the argument lost, however I did get him to concede that he would piss behind a sofa instead of in plain sight.
The image of SB's grimacing head, coupled to the sounds of piss flowing into a rapidly filling wine bottle were too hilarious to describe, so I won't attempt it. Suffice to say I missed a substantial part of the film laughing at SB's antics.
For those who don't know, a Paul Masson bottle has a screw / clip-on lid as well as tapering sides which allow easy access for piss as well as convenient replacement of the cap for those stupid enough to drink wine by the glass rather than the bottle. See here. The bottle sat on the table, fermenting both chemically and in a more abstract way - bubbling up ideas in my fertile mind.
The bottle, filled as it was with urine, looked exactly the same as when it was first purchased. Myself and SB settled on a plan. There was a bus stop 10 metres from our flat which was often populated by Pikeys. A full bottle of a "classy" wine like Paul Masson would be a supreme treat for them. We put the full bottle on the wall next to the bus stop and retired to the flat to drink further and wait for our trap to be sprung.
The next day we left the flat for supplies and walked past the bottle we had managed to forget about in fits of laughter. It was still proudly displayed on the wall, something that amazed us both. A brief (2 hour) stint at the pub later we returned with snacks and drinks ready to settle in. The bottle was gone.
It had not travelled far and was located upside down, empty, in the bin next to the bus stop. Using the empirical evidence at our disposal, we formed the following conclusions:
> At least one person had touched a bottle full of SB's piss.
> At least one person had opened this bottle
We also made the following, fairly sound assumptions:
> At least one person thought that the contents were a gift of wine.
> At least one person smelled the contents of this bottle, or otherwise discovered its contents.
> This person was most likely a Pikey, or Pikette.
Obvious, unsubstantiated conclusions could also be drawn, such as some Pikey having a drink of this "wine". This would certainly not be outside the realms of possibility - an average Pikey would share intelligence levels with an amoeba and therefore drink down the gift with little thought for consequence. However, myself and SB were more than happy with the sound assertions we could make and no further conjecture was required to leave us crying happy tears of justice at the suffering of at least one Pikey.